
Understanding Consumer Purchase Intention for Electric Vehicles: The Role of Subsidy Types, Economic Benefits, and Facilitation Readiness
Randy Raharja Barlian
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia
Djoko Sihono Gabriel
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia
Rahmat Nurcahyo
Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia
Abstract
The transportation sector significantly contributes to carbon emissions in Indonesia. To meet net zero emissions target by 2060, the government promotes a transition to electric vehicles (EVs). However, EV adoption remains below the 2030 target due to low consumer interest. Kompas survey revealed that 54.9% of respondents were unwilling to switch to EVs. This study investigates key factors influencing consumers' intention to purchase electric vehicles, focusing on electric cars in Indonesia. The research introduces a novel approach by separating financial subsidies into two categories: initial purchase subsidies (e.g., reductions in price, purchase tax, registration fee, loan interest rate) and long-term operational subsidies (e.g., reductions in annual tax, energy cost, maintenance expenses). It also considers perceived economic benefit and facilitation readiness as explanatory variables and examines the mediating role of economic benefit. Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), data were collected from respondents across numerous Indonesian regions. Results show all four variables significantly influence purchase intention, with long-term operational subsidies exert a stronger influence compared to initial purchase subsidies. Perceived economic benefit significantly mediates subsidy effects. These findings emphasize the need to strengthen subsidy schemes, improve infrastructure readiness, and enhance consumer education to boost EV adoption.
Keywords: Electric vehicle, PLS-SEM, Purchase intention, Subsidy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ejssh.v10i1.10573
References:
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Antara News. (2024). Indonesia target 15 juta kendaraan listrik digunakan pada 2030. Antara News. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4342755/indonesia-target-15-juta-kendaraan-listrik-digunakan-pada-2030
Arief, M., Akhra, Y., & Vanany, I. (2023). A robust and efficient optimization model for electric vehicle charging stations in developing countries under electricity uncertainty. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.05470
Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Abdullah, R., Mahmoud, M., Alkinani, M. H., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 124474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474
Asati, P., Raghuwanshi, S., Vashisht, A., Muley, D., & Khare, V. K. (2024). Exploring the green energy: Factors influencing battery electric vehicles adoption in Madhya Pradesh region. International Review of Management and Marketing, 14(5), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.16653
Boo, S. Y., & Tan, C. (2024). Electric vehicles purchase intention: The role of mediators using an extended TPB model. Journal of Contemporary Marketing Science, 7(2), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMARS-11-2023-0042
Butt, M. H., & Singh, J. G. (2023). Factors affecting electric vehicle acceptance, energy demand, and CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 2, 100081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geits.2023.100081
Chang, T.-Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394221002
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Vrontis, D., & Bresciani, S. (2024). Exploring the effect of government incentives on electric vehicle purchase intention in smart cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 477, 143841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143841
Climate Transparency Report. (2022). Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action. Climate Transparency. Climate Transparency Report. https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-Indonesia-Web.pdf
Damayanti, S., Hidayatno, A., & Setiawan, A. D. (2020). User acceptance of electric vehicles in Indonesia: A conceptual model. Proceedings of ACM APCORISE ’20 (June 2020, Depok, West Java, Indonesia, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400934.3400956
Digalwar, A. K., & Rastogi, A. (2023). Assessments of social factors responsible for adoption of electric vehicles in India: a case study. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2021-0009
ESDM Report. (2022). Kendaraan listrik, aksi nyata wujudkan energi lebih bersih dan ramah lingkungan. ESDM Report; ESDM. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/kendaraan-listrik-aksi-nyata-wujudkan-energi-lebih-bersih-dan-ramah-lingkungan
Gaikindo Report. (2024). Survei: Peminat kendaraan listrik di Indonesia masih sedikit. Gaikindo Report. https://www.gaikindo.or.id/survei-peminat-kendaraan-listrik-di-indonesia-masih-sedikit/
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hawkins, T. R., Gausen, O. M., & Strømman, A. H. (2013). Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles: A review. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(9), 5376–5385. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9
He, X., Zhan, W., & Hu, Y. (2018). Consumer purchase intention of electric vehicles in China: The roles of perception and personality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 1060–1069.
Hu, X., Wang, S., Zhou, R., Li, P., & Wu, X. (2024). Exploring the effects of information sources on consumers’ purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2024.2357256
Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
Ivanova, G., & Moreira, A. C. (2023). Antecedents of electric vehicle purchase intention from the consumer’s perspective: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(4), 2878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042878
Jain, N. K., Bhaskar, K., & Jain, S. (2022). What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived 1 risk and government support. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2 42, 100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100730
Liu, Y., Cui, C., Zhang, C., Xia, B., Chen, Q., & Skitmore, M. (2021). Effects of economic compensation on public acceptance of waste-to-energy incineration projects: An attribution theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(9), 1515–1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1834366
Manutworakit, P., & Choocharukul, K. (2022). Factors influencing battery electric vehicle adoption in Thailand—Expanding the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology’s variables. Sustainability, 14(14), 8482. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148482
Nikel Media. (2024). Stafsus Menteri ESDM: Populasi kendaraan listrik April 2024 capai 133.225 unit. Nikel Media. https://nikel.co.id/2024/06/20/stafsus-menteri-esdm-populasi-kendaraan-listrik-april-2024-capai-133-225-unit/
Samarasinghe, D., Kuruppu, G. N., & Dissanayake, T. (2024). Factors influencing the purchase intention toward electric vehicles: A nonuser perspective. South Asian Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJM-04-2023-0026
Santoso, M., Lestiani, D. D., Kurniawati, S., Damastuti, E., Kusmartini, I., Atmodjo, D. P. D., Sari, D. K., Hopke, P. K., Mukhtar, R., Muhtarom, T., Tjahyadi, A., Parian, S., Kholik, N., Sutrisno, D. A., Wahyudi, D., Sitorus, T. D., Djamilus, J., Riadi, A., Supriyanto, J., & Dahyar, N. (2020). Assessment of urban air quality in Indonesia. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2019.09.0451
Singh, V., Singh, V., & Vaibhav, S. (2020). A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102436
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sun, Z., & Lee, B. (2024). Exploring factors influencing electric vehicle purchase intentions through an extended technology acceptance model. Vehicles, 6(4), 1513–1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles6030072
Tarascon, J. M., & Armand, M. (2001). Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 414(6861), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104644
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Wang, Z.-X., Chee, W. M., Jantan, A. H. B., Xia, Y.-H., Xue, H., Ye, M.-J., Zhang, Q., Wong, P. P. W., Gong, Y., & Wang, L. (2024). Impact of perceived value in virtual brand communities on purchase intention of domestic electric vehicles. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104371
Zhao, B. (2024). Determining intention of consumers to purchase electric vehicles in Chongqing, China. The Scholar: Human Sciences, 16(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.14456/shserj.2024.42
Zhao, H., Furuoka, F., Rasiah, R. A. L., & Shen, E. (2024). Consumers’ purchase intention toward electric vehicles from the perspective of perceived green value: An empirical survey from China. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(267). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15060267
Zhou, M., Long, P., Kong, N., Zhao, L., Jia, F., & Campy, K. S. (2021). Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 144, 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.001



